Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTS 250 512MB vs Radeon R7 250

Intro

The GeForce GTS 250 512MB comes with a clock frequency of 738 MHz and a GDDR3 memory speed of 1100 MHz. It also features a 256-bit memory bus, and uses a 65/55 nm design. It features 128 SPUs, 64 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R7 250, which features a clock frequency of 1000 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1150 MHz. It also makes use of a 128-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It features 384 SPUs, 24 Texture Address Units, and 8 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 250 65 Watts
GeForce GTS 250 512MB 145 Watts
Difference: 80 Watts (123%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the Radeon R7 250 should perform just a bit faster than the GeForce GTS 250 512MB overall. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 73600 MB/sec
GeForce GTS 250 512MB 70400 MB/sec
Difference: 3200 (5%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTS 250 512MB is much (more or less 97%) better at AF than the Radeon R7 250. (explain)

GeForce GTS 250 512MB 47232 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 250 24000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 23232 (97%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTS 250 512MB should be a lot (more or less 48%) faster with regards to AA than the Radeon R7 250, and also should be capable of handling higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

GeForce GTS 250 512MB 11808 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 250 8000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3808 (48%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTS 250 512MB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTS 250 512MB Radeon R7 250
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year March 3, 2009 October 2013
Code Name G92a/b Oland XT
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 738 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 2200 MHz 4600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 145 watts 65 watts
Bandwidth 70400 MB/sec 73600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 47232 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 11808 Mpixels/sec 8000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 128 384
Texture Mapping Units 64 24
Render Output Units 16 8
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65/55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 754 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTS 250 512MB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield