GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon R7 260X

Intro

Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 260X, which comes with a core clock frequency of 1100 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1625 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It features 896 SPUs, 56 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 260X		115 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216		202 Watts
	Difference: 87 Watts (76%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 should perform just a bit faster than the Radeon R7 260X in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216		111888 MB/sec
Radeon R7 260X		104000 MB/sec
	Difference: 7888 (8%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 260X is much (more or less 49%) more effective at AF than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216. (explain)

Radeon R7 260X		61600 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216		41472 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 20128 (49%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R7 260X will be a small bit (about 9%) faster with regards to anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216, and also should be able to handle higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

Radeon R7 260X		17600 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216		16128 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 1472 (9%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.