Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX Titan X vs Radeon R9 295X2
IntroThe GeForce GTX Titan X uses a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 1000 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a speed of 1750 MHz on this particular model. It features 3072 SPUs as well as 192 TAUs and 96 ROPs.Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 295X2, which comes with a GPU core clock speed of 1018 MHz, and 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory running at 1250 MHz through a 512-bit bus. It also is comprised of 2816 SPUs, 176 Texture Address Units, and 64 ROPs.
Display Graphs
BenchmarksThese are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthThe Radeon R9 295X2 should in theory be much faster than the GeForce GTX Titan X in general. (explain)
Texel RateThe Radeon R9 295X2 will be quite a bit (approximately 87%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX Titan X. (explain)
Pixel RateThe Radeon R9 295X2 will be quite a bit (about 36%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX Titan X, and will be able to handle higher resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. One or more cards in this comparison are multi-core. This means that their bandwidth, texel and pixel rates are theoretically doubled - this does not mean the card will actually perform twice as fast, but only that it should in theory be able to. Actual game benchmarks will give a more accurate idea of what it's capable of. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
4 Responses to “GeForce GTX Titan X vs Radeon R9 295X2”It's funny that nVidia even tries to sell the Titan X, since the Z is upcoming and the R9 295X2 is way better than anything nVidia has made (and easily $450 cheaper)
Thank you finally someone with some sense!
Two great cards. Make no mistake.
I bought a 295X2 a month ago and the performance / price point is absolutely astonishing. I'm absolutely aware that nVidia's Titan X is a faster 'single core' performer, but every AAA game that I've played so far has run like a banshee without any issues. The exception is Titanfall, but that game is so bad it's hardly an issue.
Battlefield 4 and Shadow of Mordore are just insane for example. The only thing that might usurp it is the forthcoming 390X, but I can't see it happening, hence I made the purchase!
jajajaj
donde estan los de Nvidia?