GeForce GTX 950 vs Radeon R7 260X

Intro

Compare all that to the Radeon R7 260X, which features core speeds of 1100 MHz on the GPU, and 1625 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 896 SPUs as well as 56 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX 950		6536 points
Radeon R7 260X		4381 points
	Difference: 2155 (49%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R7 260X		14 Mh/s
GeForce GTX 950		10 Mh/s
	Difference: 4 (40%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

GeForce GTX 950		155 Sol/s
Radeon R7 260X		95 Sol/s
	Difference: 60 (63%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 950		90 Watts
Radeon R7 260X		115 Watts
	Difference: 25 Watts (28%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 950 should in theory be a bit superior to the Radeon R7 260X in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 950		105728 MB/sec
Radeon R7 260X		104000 MB/sec
	Difference: 1728 (2%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 260X will be quite a bit (approximately 25%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 950. (explain)

Radeon R7 260X		61600 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 950		49152 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 12448 (25%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 950 is a lot (about 86%) faster with regards to anti-aliasing than the Radeon R7 260X, and also will be able to handle higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTX 950		32768 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 260X		17600 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 15168 (86%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.