Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 420 vs Radeon R7 M265

Intro

The GeForce GT 420 uses a 40 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 700 MHz. The GDDR3 memory is set to run at a speed of 900 MHz on this model. It features 48 SPUs as well as 8 TAUs and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the Radeon R7 M265, which features GPU core speed of 725 MHz, and 2048 MB of DDR3 memory set to run at 1000 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 384 Stream Processors, 24 Texture Address Units, and 8 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the Radeon R7 M265 should be a bit faster than the GeForce GT 420 overall. (explain)

Radeon R7 M265 32000 MB/sec
GeForce GT 420 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 3200 (11%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 M265 is much (more or less 211%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GT 420. (explain)

Radeon R7 M265 17400 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 420 5600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 11800 (211%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R7 M265 is a lot (about 107%) more effective at full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GT 420, and also will be able to handle higher resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

Radeon R7 M265 5800 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 420 2800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3000 (107%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 420

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 M265

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 420 Radeon R7 M265
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 2010 May 1 2014
Code Name GF108 Opal XT
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 700 MHz 725 MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz 2000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 50 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 28800 MB/sec 32000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 5600 Mtexels/sec 17400 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2800 Mpixels/sec 5800 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 48 384
Texture Mapping Units 8 24
Render Output Units 4 8
Bus Type GDDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Transistors 585 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 420

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 M265

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield