Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 280

Intro

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses a 12 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 1485 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM runs at a frequency of 2001 MHz on this model. It features 896 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 32 ROPs.

Compare all of that to the GeForce GTX 280, which features GPU core speed of 602 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR3 RAM set to run at 1107 MHz through a 512-bit bus. It also is made up of 240 Stream Processors, 80 Texture Address Units, and 32 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 1650 75 Watts
GeForce GTX 280 236 Watts
Difference: 161 Watts (215%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 280 should theoretically be a small bit better than the GeForce GTX 1650 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 280 141696 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 1650 131072 MB/sec
Difference: 10624 (8%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 1650 will be quite a bit (approximately 73%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 280. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 83160 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 280 48160 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 35000 (73%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 1650 will be quite a bit (about 147%) faster with regards to FSAA than the GeForce GTX 280, and also will be capable of handling higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 47520 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 280 19264 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 28256 (147%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 280

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 280
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year April 2019 June 17, 2008
Code Name TU117-300-A1 G200
Memory 4096 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 1485 MHz 602 MHz
Memory Speed 8004 MHz 2214 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 75 watts 236 watts
Bandwidth 131072 MB/sec 141696 MB/sec
Texel Rate 83160 Mtexels/sec 48160 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 47520 Mpixels/sec 19264 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 896 240
Texture Mapping Units 56 80
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 512-bit
Fab Process 12 nm 65 nm
Transistors 4700 million 1400 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe x16 2.0
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 10
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.6 OpenGL 3.1

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 280

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield