Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6750 XT

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon RX 6750 XT, which comes with a clock frequency of 2150 MHz and a GDDR6 memory speed of 2250 MHz. It also features a 192-bit bus, and makes use of a 7 nm design. It is made up of 2560 SPUs, 160 TAUs, and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R9 Nano		175 Watts
Radeon RX 6750 XT		250 Watts
	Difference: 75 Watts (43%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R9 Nano is 16% quicker than the Radeon RX 6750 XT overall, because of its higher bandwidth. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		512000 MB/sec
Radeon RX 6750 XT		442368 MB/sec
	Difference: 69632 (16%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon RX 6750 XT should be much (approximately 34%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 Nano. (explain)

Radeon RX 6750 XT		344000 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 Nano		256000 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 88000 (34%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is much (more or less 115%) faster with regards to FSAA than the Radeon R9 Nano, and also capable of handling higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Radeon RX 6750 XT		137600 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 Nano		64000 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 73600 (115%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface within a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card could possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.