Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 6950 XT

Intro

The Radeon R9 Nano makes use of a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core speed at 1000 MHz. The HBM memory is set to run at a speed of 500 MHz on this model. It features 4096 SPUs along with 256 Texture Address Units and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon RX 6950 XT, which has a GPU core clock speed of 1925 MHz, and 16384 MB of GDDR6 memory set to run at 2250 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is made up of 5120 SPUs, 320 Texture Address Units, and 128 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R9 Nano 175 Watts
Radeon RX 6950 XT 335 Watts
Difference: 160 Watts (91%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon RX 6950 XT should perform just a bit faster than the Radeon R9 Nano overall. (explain)

Radeon RX 6950 XT 589824 MB/sec
Radeon R9 Nano 512000 MB/sec
Difference: 77824 (15%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon RX 6950 XT will be much (about 141%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 Nano. (explain)

Radeon RX 6950 XT 616000 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 Nano 256000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 360000 (141%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is much (about 285%) better at AA than the Radeon R9 Nano, and also should be capable of handling higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

Radeon RX 6950 XT 246400 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 Nano 64000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 182400 (285%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon R9 Nano

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon RX 6950 XT

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Radeon R9 Nano Radeon RX 6950 XT
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Year September 2015 May 2022
Code Name Fiji XT Navi 21
Memory 4096 MB 16384 MB
Core Speed 1000 MHz 1925 MHz
Memory Speed 500 MHz 4500 GB/s
Power (Max TDP) 175 watts 335 watts
Bandwidth 512000 MB/sec 589824 MB/sec
Texel Rate 256000 Mtexels/sec 616000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 64000 Mpixels/sec 246400 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 4096 5120
Texture Mapping Units 256 320
Render Output Units 64 128
Bus Type HBM GDDR6
Bus Width 4096-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 7 nm
Transistors 8900 million 26800 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 12
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 4.6

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon R9 Nano

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon RX 6950 XT

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield