 |
 |
GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs Radeon HD 6750
Intro
The GeForce 9800 GTX+ has core clock speeds of 738 MHz on the GPU, and 1100 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 128 SPUs as well as 64 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 6750, which comes with a core clock speed of 725 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1000 MHz. It also features a 128-bit memory bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It features 720 SPUs, 36 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Radeon HD 6750 |
|
86 Watts |
| GeForce 9800 GTX+ |
|
145 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
Performance-wise, the GeForce 9800 GTX+ should in theory be a little bit better than the Radeon HD 6750 in general. (explain)
| GeForce 9800 GTX+ |
|
70400 MB/sec |
| Radeon HD 6750 |
|
64000 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The GeForce 9800 GTX+ is much (approximately 81%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 6750. (explain)| GeForce 9800 GTX+ |
|
47232 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon HD 6750 |
|
26100 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The GeForce 9800 GTX+ will be a small bit (more or less 2%) better at AA than the Radeon HD 6750, and also should be capable of handling higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)| GeForce 9800 GTX+ |
|
11808 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon HD 6750 |
|
11600 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce 9800 GTX+Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6750Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce 9800 GTX+ | Radeon HD 6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | July 2008 | January 2011 |
| Code Name | G92b | Juniper Pro |
| Memory | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Core Speed | 738 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 2200 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 145 watts | 86 watts |
| Bandwidth | 70400 MB/sec | 64000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 47232 Mtexels/sec | 26100 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 11808 Mpixels/sec | 11600 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 128 | 720 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 64 | 36 |
| Render Output Units | 16 | 16 |
| Bus Type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 128-bit |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 754 million | 1040 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 2.0 | PCIe x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 10 | DirectX 11 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 3.0 | OpenGL 4.0 |
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card can possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.
GeForce 9800 GTX+Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6750Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs Radeon HD 6750”That is insane the old 9800GTX+ A older card beating the newer DX11 ATI 6750. People who bought the 9800 GTX+ sure have got their money's worth when 5 years later it is still out performing modern cards. I bought a used one to tied me over after I fried my 5850 and I only noticed a slight decrease in performance but not much. Great card it will always be my trusty back up.