 |
 |
GeForce 9600 GT 512MB vs Radeon HD 6770
Intro
The GeForce 9600 GT 512MB has a core clock frequency of 650 MHz and a GDDR3 memory frequency of 900 MHz. It also features a 256-bit memory bus, and uses a 65/55 nm design. It is made up of 64 SPUs, 32 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.Compare that to the Radeon HD 6770, which features clock speeds of 900 MHz on the GPU, and 1050 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 800 SPUs as well as 40 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| GeForce 9600 GT 512MB |
|
95 Watts |
| Radeon HD 6770 |
|
108 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
The Radeon HD 6770, in theory, should be just a bit faster than the GeForce 9600 GT 512MB overall. (explain)
| Radeon HD 6770 |
|
67200 MB/sec |
| GeForce 9600 GT 512MB |
|
57600 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Radeon HD 6770 will be much (about 73%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce 9600 GT 512MB. (explain)| Radeon HD 6770 |
|
36000 Mtexels/sec |
| GeForce 9600 GT 512MB |
|
20800 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The Radeon HD 6770 should be much (approximately 38%) faster with regards to FSAA than the GeForce 9600 GT 512MB, and should be able to handle higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)| Radeon HD 6770 |
|
14400 Mpixels/sec |
| GeForce 9600 GT 512MB |
|
10400 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce 9600 GT 512MBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6770Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce 9600 GT 512MB | Radeon HD 6770 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | Feb 2008 | January 2011 |
| Code Name | G94a/b | Juniper XT |
| Memory | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Core Speed | 650 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 1800 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 95 watts | 108 watts |
| Bandwidth | 57600 MB/sec | 67200 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 20800 Mtexels/sec | 36000 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 10400 Mpixels/sec | 14400 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 64 | 800 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 32 | 40 |
| Render Output Units | 16 | 16 |
| Bus Type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 128-bit |
| Fab Process | 65/55 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 505 million | 1040 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 2.0 | PCIe x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 10 | DirectX 11 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 3.0 | OpenGL 4.1 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.
GeForce 9600 GT 512MBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6770Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “GeForce 9600 GT 512MB vs Radeon HD 6770”[...] UPGRADE ECS 9600gt a ?????? GeForce 9600 GT 512MB vs Radeon HD 6770 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare segun eso serian 13w mas de carga para tu fuente no creo que se muera la fuente por [...]