Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 285 1GB vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Intro

The GeForce GTX 285 1GB comes with a GPU clock speed of 648 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR3 memory runs at 1242 MHz through a 512-bit bus. It also is made up of 240 SPUs, 80 TAUs, and 32 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GTX 560 Ti, which makes use of a 40 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 822 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a frequency of 1002 MHz on this model. It features 384 SPUs along with 64 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 170 Watts
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 204 Watts
Difference: 34 Watts (20%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 285 1GB should in theory be quite a bit superior to the GeForce GTX 560 Ti in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 285 1GB 158976 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 128256 MB/sec
Difference: 30720 (24%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a little bit (about 1%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 285 1GB. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 52608 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 51840 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 768 (1%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti should be much (about 27%) more effective at FSAA than the GeForce GTX 285 1GB, and also able to handle higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 26304 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 285 1GB 20736 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 5568 (27%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 285 1GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 285 1GB GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year January 15, 2009 January 2011
Code Name G200b GF114
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 648 MHz 822 MHz
Memory Speed 2484 MHz 4008 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 204 watts 170 watts
Bandwidth 158976 MB/sec 128256 MB/sec
Texel Rate 51840 Mtexels/sec 52608 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 20736 Mpixels/sec 26304 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 240 384
Texture Mapping Units 80 64
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 512-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 40 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1950 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 285 1GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

4 Responses to “GeForce GTX 285 1GB vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti”
Best Bang for the Buck? - SLUniverse Forums says:

[...] choice on core number rather than just latest and greatest... you might find this interesting GeForce GTX 285 1GB vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compa... __________________ Apocalips Japan Blog Visit the [...]

Troy says:

I build my own computers for me and my family. I also build for other peaple as well for a little xtra cash. When i do my builds i reserch every main component i install.i decided to check into the 200 series video cards to se how far the 400 and 500 series have advanced.Much to my surprise i did not find much diference. It seems to me the 285 overall is better then the 560 and the 285 matches up very well against the 560 firmi.I am building 2 new machines at the moment, 1 for me 1 for my son. I plan to get a gtx 285 for mine and a 560 firmi for him. this will tell me how closly matched they are.

Nvidia firmi | Consideritdone says:

[...] GeForce GTX 285 1GB vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti – Performance …Feb 7, 2012 … nVidia has clocked the core speed at 648 MHz. …. the 285 overall is better then the 560 and the 285 matches up very well against the 560 firmi. [...]

Dionm says:

Troy remember though that the 560 supports directx 11 and opengl v4 - it also performs similar if not slightly better than a 6950. It would be more efficient overall as its a newer core design. Also I hope that your son's and your computer have identical specs for everything aside from graphics... otherwise a fair comparison cannot be pulled...

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield