Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon HD 7850
IntroThe GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 features a clock frequency of 732 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 900 MHz. It also features a 320-bit bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It features 448 SPUs, 56 Texture Address Units, and 40 ROPs.Compare all that to the Radeon HD 7850, which features GPU clock speed of 860 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1200 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is made up of 1024 Stream Processors, 64 Texture Address Units, and 32 Raster Operation Units.
Display Graphs
BenchmarksThese are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthIn theory, the Radeon HD 7850 should be a small bit faster than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 overall. (explain)
Texel RateThe Radeon HD 7850 should be much (approximately 34%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448. (explain)
Pixel RateThe GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is just a bit (more or less 6%) better at anti-aliasing than the Radeon HD 7850, and able to handle higher resolutions better. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon HD 7850”[...] Definitely the HD 7850 ( OC'd to 975mhz) would be a better choice because it has the new 28nm architecture, powerfull (compared to GTX560 TI) n stuff ( 2GB RAM and consumes less power ) Check this site out for more performance comparisons... ( Nvidia Geforce GTX 560 TI 448 vs AMD Radeon HD 7850) GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon HD 7850 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compar... [...]