 |
 |
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon HD 5750 1GB
Intro
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti comes with a core clock frequency of 928 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1350 MHz. It also makes use of a 128-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is made up of 768 SPUs, 64 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.Compare all of that to the Radeon HD 5750 1GB, which uses a 40 nm design. AMD has clocked the core speed at 700 MHz. The GDDR5 memory works at a speed of 1150 MHz on this particular model. It features 720(144x5) SPUs as well as 36 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
86 Watts |
| GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|
110 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
In theory, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti should be 17% quicker than the Radeon HD 5750 1GB in general, because of its higher data rate. (explain)
| GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|
86400 MB/sec |
| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
73600 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is quite a bit (about 136%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 5750 1GB. (explain)| GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|
59392 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
25200 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If using a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 650 Ti is a better choice, by far. (explain)| GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|
14848 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|
11200 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GTX 650 TiAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 5750 1GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GTX 650 Ti | Radeon HD 5750 1GB |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | October 2012 | October 13, 2009 |
| Code Name | GK106 | Juniper LE |
| Memory | 1024 MB | 1024 MB |
| Core Speed | 928 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 5400 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 110 watts | 86 watts |
| Bandwidth | 86400 MB/sec | 73600 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 59392 Mtexels/sec | 25200 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 14848 Mpixels/sec | 11200 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 768 | 720(144x5) |
| Texture Mapping Units | 64 | 36 |
| Render Output Units | 16 | 16 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 2540 million | 1040 million |
| Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.1 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11.0 | DirectX 11 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.3 | OpenGL 3.2 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.
GeForce GTX 650 TiAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 5750 1GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon HD 5750 1GB”The ATI 5750 was a pretty good card My friend had one in is i7 870
Now has a ATI 7770.
But it seemed to play games as well as my old 5850 did. Goes to show you do not need expensive for high end gaming.