Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX Titan X vs Radeon R9 295X2

Intro

The GeForce GTX Titan X uses a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 1000 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM is set to run at a speed of 1750 MHz on this card. It features 3072 SPUs along with 192 Texture Address Units and 96 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the Radeon R9 295X2, which comes with GPU clock speed of 1018 MHz, and 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory running at 1250 MHz through a 512-bit bus. It also is comprised of 2816 SPUs, 176 TAUs, and 64 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 295X2 21205 points
GeForce GTX Titan X 17879 points
Difference: 3326 (19%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX Titan X 250 Watts
Radeon R9 295X2 500 Watts
Difference: 250 Watts (100%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon R9 295X2 will be 90% faster than the GeForce GTX Titan X overall, due to its greater data rate. (explain)

Radeon R9 295X2 640000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX Titan X 336000 MB/sec
Difference: 304000 (90%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 295X2 will be a lot (about 87%) better at AF than the GeForce GTX Titan X. (explain)

Radeon R9 295X2 358336 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX Titan X 192000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 166336 (87%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 295X2 is quite a bit (about 36%) more effective at full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX Titan X, and also should be able to handle higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Radeon R9 295X2 130304 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX Titan X 96000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 34304 (36%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

One or more cards in this comparison are multi-core. This means that their bandwidth, texel and pixel rates are theoretically doubled - this does not mean the card will actually perform twice as fast, but only that it should in theory be able to. Actual game benchmarks will give a more accurate idea of what it's capable of.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX Titan X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 295X2

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX Titan X Radeon R9 295X2
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year March 2015 April 2014
Code Name GM200 Vesuvius
Memory 12288 MB 4096 MB (x2)
Core Speed 1000 MHz 1018 MHz (x2)
Memory Speed 7000 MHz 5000 MHz (x2)
Power (Max TDP) 250 watts 500 watts
Bandwidth 336000 MB/sec 640000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 192000 Mtexels/sec 358336 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 96000 Mpixels/sec 130304 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 3072 2816 (x2)
Texture Mapping Units 192 176 (x2)
Render Output Units 96 64 (x2)
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 384-bit 512-bit (x2)
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 8000 million 6200 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX Titan X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 295X2

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

4 Responses to “GeForce GTX Titan X vs Radeon R9 295X2”
FuzzleSnuz says:

It's funny that nVidia even tries to sell the Titan X, since the Z is upcoming and the R9 295X2 is way better than anything nVidia has made (and easily $450 cheaper)

The Gambit1337 says:

Thank you finally someone with some sense!

Ian Witts says:

Two great cards. Make no mistake.

I bought a 295X2 a month ago and the performance / price point is absolutely astonishing. I'm absolutely aware that nVidia's Titan X is a faster 'single core' performer, but every AAA game that I've played so far has run like a banshee without any issues. The exception is Titanfall, but that game is so bad it's hardly an issue.

Battlefield 4 and Shadow of Mordore are just insane for example. The only thing that might usurp it is the forthcoming 390X, but I can't see it happening, hence I made the purchase!

Medwar says:

jajajaj
donde estan los de Nvidia?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield