Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon R9 M365X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 965M comes with core clock speeds of 944 MHz on the GPU, and 1000 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 1024 SPUs as well as 64 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 M365X, which features GPU core speed of 925 MHz, and 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory running at 1125 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 640 Stream Processors, 40 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon R9 M365X should theoretically be a bit superior to the GeForce GTX 965M overall. (explain)

Radeon R9 M365X 72000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 965M 64000 MB/sec
Difference: 8000 (13%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 965M will be a lot (approximately 63%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R9 M365X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 965M 60416 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 M365X 37000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 23416 (63%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 965M is much (more or less 104%) faster with regards to full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon R9 M365X, and also able to handle higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTX 965M 30208 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 M365X 14800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 15408 (104%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 965M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M365X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 965M Radeon R9 M365X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year January 5 2015 2015
Code Name GM204 Cape Verde
Memory 2048 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 944 MHz 925 MHz
Memory Speed 4000 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 64000 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 60416 Mtexels/sec 37000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 30208 Mpixels/sec 14800 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 1024 640
Texture Mapping Units 64 40
Render Output Units 32 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors (Unknown) million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12 DirectX 12
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 965M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M365X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield