Geforce GTX 1080 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 64

Intro

Compare those specs to the Radeon RX Vega 64, which uses a 14 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 1247 MHz. The HBM2 memory is set to run at a speed of 1890 MHz on this particular model. It features 4096 SPUs as well as 256 TAUs and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		27629 points
Radeon RX Vega 64		21986 points
	Difference: 5643 (26%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		250 Watts
Radeon RX Vega 64		295 Watts
	Difference: 45 Watts (18%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Geforce GTX 1080 Ti will be 0% faster than the Radeon RX Vega 64 in general, due to its greater bandwidth. (explain)

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		495616 MB/sec
Radeon RX Vega 64		495411 MB/sec
	Difference: 205 (0%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 1080 Ti should be a bit (more or less 4%) better at texture filtering than the Radeon RX Vega 64. (explain)

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		331520 Mtexels/sec
Radeon RX Vega 64		319232 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 12288 (4%)

Pixel Rate

The Geforce GTX 1080 Ti will be a lot (more or less 63%) faster with regards to full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon RX Vega 64, and capable of handling higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		130240 Mpixels/sec
Radeon RX Vega 64		79808 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 50432 (63%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.