 |
 |
Radeon HD 3650 vs Radeon HD 3650 256MB
Intro
The Radeon HD 3650 has a clock speed of 725 MHz and a GDDR4 memory speed of 800 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 55 nm design. It features 120(24x5) SPUs, 8 TAUs, and 4 ROPs.Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 3650 256MB, which makes use of a 55 nm design. AMD has set the core speed at 725 MHz. The DDR2 RAM is set to run at a frequency of 800 MHz on this particular model. It features 120(24x5) SPUs along with 8 TAUs and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Both cards have the same power consumption.Memory Bandwidth
Both cards have the exact same memory bandwidth, so theoretically they should perform the same. (explain)
Texel Rate
Both cards have exactly the same texel fill rate, so theoretically they should perform equally good at at AF. (explain)Pixel Rate
Both cards have exactly the same pixel fill rate, so theoretically they should perform equally good at at full screen anti-aliasing, and be able to handle the same resolutions. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Radeon HD 3650Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 3650 256MBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | Radeon HD 3650 | Radeon HD 3650 256MB |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Year | 2008 | 2008 |
| Code Name | RV635 PRO | RV635 PRO |
| Memory | 1024 MB | 256 MB |
| Core Speed | 725 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 78 watts | 78 watts |
| Bandwidth | 25600 MB/sec | 25600 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 5800 Mtexels/sec | 5800 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 2900 Mpixels/sec | 2900 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 120(24x5) | 120(24x5) |
| Texture Mapping Units | 8 | 8 |
| Render Output Units | 4 | 4 |
| Bus Type | GDDR4 | DDR2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Transistors | (Unknown) million | (Unknown) million |
| Bus | PCIe 2.0 x16/AGP 8x | PCIe 2.0 x16/AGP 8x |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 10.1 | DirectX 10.1 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 3.0 | OpenGL 3.0 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.
Radeon HD 3650Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 3650 256MBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!