GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 285 2GB

Intro

Compare all of that to the GeForce GTX 285 2GB, which makes use of a 55 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 648 MHz. The GDDR3 memory runs at a frequency of 1242 MHz on this model. It features 240 SPUs as well as 80 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 1650		75 Watts
GeForce GTX 285 2GB		204 Watts
	Difference: 129 Watts (172%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 285 2GB should theoretically perform quite a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 1650 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 285 2GB		158976 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 1650		131072 MB/sec
	Difference: 27904 (21%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 1650 is quite a bit (about 60%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 285 2GB. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650		83160 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 285 2GB		51840 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 31320 (60%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 1650 is quite a bit (more or less 129%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 285 2GB, and able to handle higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650		47520 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 285 2GB		20736 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 26784 (129%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card can possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.