Compare any two graphics cards:
Radeon HD 6950 2GB vs Radeon HD 6970
IntroThe Radeon HD 6950 2GB features a GPU clock speed of 800 MHz, and the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory is set to run at 1250 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is comprised of 1408 Stream Processors, 88 Texture Address Units, and 32 ROPs.Compare all that to the Radeon HD 6970, which features GPU core speed of 880 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1375 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is comprised of 1536 Stream Processors, 96 TAUs, and 32 ROPs.
Display Graphs
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthTheoretically, the Radeon HD 6970 should perform a small bit faster than the Radeon HD 6950 2GB overall. (explain)
Texel RateThe Radeon HD 6970 is a little bit (more or less 20%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 6950 2GB. (explain)
Pixel RateIf running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Radeon HD 6970 is a better choice, but only just. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
5 Responses to “Radeon HD 6950 2GB vs Radeon HD 6970”Could you compare HD6950 2GB with HD6970 mod to the factory HD6970?
JD it would be the same.
If the 6950 was flashed bios to 6970 will it give the same fps and same performance ?
[...] CrossFireX Support Video Card with Eyefinity Theoretical benchmark for 6970(1gig) vs 6950(2gig) Radeon HD 6950 2GB vs Radeon HD 6970 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare The 2 gig 6970 will give the higher resolution, but performance should be about the [...]
@swiftymicvey .. No it won't perform as good as a stock 6970, as its behind on the TMU's, core & memory clocks. Unless any of the folk talking up the 6950 can magically bump the TMU's and simultaneously bump the core & memory on a 6950 to the same level, it will still be behind overall in benchmarks and in real-time, 3D gaming performance. No amount of wishful thinking will change that.